Friday, October 31, 2008

seeing RED*

You work hard. You want to keep the money you earn and spend it however you see fit. But Barack Obama calls that "selfishness." You see, he wants to "spread the wealth" to people like this moron woman who, if Obama gets elected, will no longer have to worry about putting gas in her car or paying her mortgage.

Hooray for her! That sounds great!

But, wait, who will end up paying her bills?


*RED as in socialism


phlegmfatale said...

So, let's get this straight - it's selfish and greedy of us to want to keep what we earn, but it's not selfish and greedy for someone else to get something they did NOT earn? Bizarre. I don't know how anyone can justify such non-thinking.

B Smith said...

Did his kindergarten teacher take the toys he saved his allowance for, and give them to another child (who broke or never returned them)?

Did the lunch lady at his school take the sandwich his mother made for him and distribute it equally among all the students because it was "too big" for one small child?

Charity that is FORCED is not charity at all, but a TAX. Obama is a socialist, not some fuzzy, warm-hearted humanitarian. His ideas have been failing all over the globe for the last 100 years. And there is no way I believe that he doesn't know this, which makes him simply evil.

Anonymous said...

In his example, Obama shared HIS toys and HIS sandwich. Similarly, I chose to share my assets with those I want to help. That is a lot different than Obama TAKING MY ASSETS to share with those he wants to help. Obama is too smart to not understand the difference, which makes his character highly suspect.